Simply they have also changed their function. Already they do not preserve your stability as a worker. They now advise as you have to output, have an exclusive feature of goats drivers mere espiatorios of the rules that the State may not get to know if met or not, but it is through the complaint. I see two options for this change: resistance, frustration, the reproach, the inactivity at the end with an escapist speech (I dare say), placed at the service of the most ferocious capitalism that currently occurs with certain class of worker not formed, unqualified to generating an exploitative economy. And, another action, adaptation (fruit of attention, perception, and learning through our cognitive process), changing the tone of the risk, CORROSION of character or GERM of change. Even knowing that they are selling me the bike as it says in his book of that title Noam Chomsky. Social and philosophical speeches should not be only in the service of the tradition, life is a process of change.
We cannot, nor let us cajole (life or death), ends at the end and after will experience two things and there will be no death, but there is life and vice versa. Live all the possibilities. Adapting to a changing world. In this hubbub of change in this spin that makes the Postindustrial society what happens with our identity? The culture seems engulfed into the vulnerability and despair. At the individual level, the feeling is that our life is meaningless as demonstrated in the adolescent insecurity or rejection and isolation faced by our elders. And in search of meanings we can conclude an obsession by the ethics, morality and the infirm phobias. This is the feeling so torn that produces me the article, far stimulate me so I predisposing to a social demand (which is what I expected from the same), leads me to a frustration and yet sentiment from unprotected and defenceless.