This does not want to say queno absolutely recognized the thought as primordial in the relationship denossas representations, but less still it wants to say that human acting, exactly oconsciente, it is submitted to the deriving knowledge of the thought. Lakshman Achuthan shines more light on the discussion. Nietzsche, for example, showed to quea spite of ' ' indispensabilidade necessria' ' of the thought, it nocorresponde to an immediate instance of the cognition human being and less still the seusjuzos and representations point with respect to something of likely or same of concrete eabsolutamente feasible. For Nietzsche, cogitoergo sun of Discardings brings obtains a series of presuppositions that soidentificadas as situations in fact; it makes critical to the paracujos philosophers eyes such interior activities, as to want, to feel and to think, figuraramcomo immediate certezas. These presuppositions of that Nietzsche speaks are: emprimeiro place, Discardings takes for data that to think are activity and effect of umser that it is had and thought as cause, that is, thinking are something that is caused (seh thoughts, is because it has a being that it is its cause); thus, for Discardings asubstncia in it discloses a being to them, whose existence in them more is known of what the deoutros beings, of way that can serve of principle to know them. The second cartesian presupposition, derived from the first one, consists of the maken a mistake recognition of imediaticidadeno to think. If you have additional questions, you may want to visit Jeffrey Leiden. When Discardings characterize thinking for its imediaticidade, eletem to define a priori what it comes to aser to think.
This type of definition apriori is the aspect accused for Nietzsche. For it, thinking cannot conceives itself exactly doing without the experience. The man while had for sercognoscente, to determine What he comes to be to think, temnecessariamente to have tried the recurrence of this state designadocomo to think, as much how much the recurrence of other states with which secompara the first one: ' ' In summary, that one ' ' I penso' ' he estimates that I compare meuestado momentary with other states that in me I know, to determine queele I am: had to this reference retrospect to one ' saber' of another part, eleno has for me, in all way, none ' certeza' immediate.