II who or what dictates, in short, what is authentic have? Who has and who does not? Is the subject a consideration about paradigms and conventions? Does it matter who owns? Then, one who has is, so a wise man, still owner of the disembodied, or anything has and nobody is not? In any way the subject belongs to the conventional. Not say that someone has something owns nothing if it is not able to derive power from its holdings and if it is not able to protect them. We speak of the granite world of material things, susceptible to take physical and aggressive forms Tools, weapons, able to cut physical lives. We talked about the effective culture of the soldier, armed to kill, defending themselves, to their gods, Lords and interests. Wrought iron, concrete matter that has, its inherent capabilities of death, are not a Convention, but a tangible effect de facto. Because the man runs in the middle of nature itself that carries it: the physical body that breathes, feeds and defecates; the same one that requires space to be and, although his mind is aware of all such needs, the animality of the species. It is in particular flesh and matter, ideas belong to the dimension of what is not, lacking any tangible effect of worldly life. It is Santo Tomas playing and not Jesucristo preaching a utopia of the impossible.
The idol of the market, Bacon, as the conventionality influencing the culture of inautenticos modes of life, can be considered quite and can accept, as indeed happens in life, that is someone who It has and is owner of things, seen in a certain way and have power, living a dolce vita; but nothing shall exceed, as best explanation for passing on this natural human materialism, the very fact of the man of being a corporeality that requires physical fuel to go on living. Who in discurridos terms, it is material. Strike talk about being (in this everyday sense that we try), because in followed by wave is presented as a consequence, under the focus of the idol of Bacon cited prejudice. Knowledge involves a mode of being, essence, already quite contrasted with the material subject of the discussion. Original author and source of the article.